Interview with Muse Art - What makes a Master Piece?
We all know the World-famous paintings and art
work, but have you ever wondered why some pieces are considered ‘masterpieces’
when there are plenty of seemingly similar works out there? What differentiates
some pieces apart from others? And who exactly decides this? In our quest to
deeper understand the qualities behind design, Lolo and Galago set to find out
the answers.
Jess Cummings, the manager of Muse Art- a private art company which sources
artwork for private collections and manages placements for international
properties talks to us about ‘What Makes a piece of Art a Master Piece’. Below,
she answers our questions and brings to life all the different levels of art.
What do you
think of as a Masterpiece?
When
one hears ‘Masterpiece’ one may think of the Mona Lisa by Da Vinci,
Starry Night by Van Gogh, Sistine Chapel frescos by Michelangelo, the Birth of
Venus by Botticelli, Water lilies by Monet, the Venus de Milo C. 100 B.C,
Les Demoiselles d’Avignon by Picasso or possibly Duchamp’s
‘Fountain’. These are widely acclaimed as ‘Masterpieces’ but the saying
‘One man’s trash is another man’s treasure’ comes to mind because like all art,
a masterpiece is very much a subjective term.
They may all be
all different but what do you think makes each one a masterpiece?
The
general understanding of what makes a masterpiece is usually a work of art that
for that era has technically or conceptually challenged everything that has
preceded it. i.e. The Impressionist movement moved away from depicting a
setting in the real, ‘as is situation’ and chose to use visible thick brush
strokes or dots, a radical idea at the time violating the rules of academic
painting.
What do
scholars/professors of art tend to look for in a 'masterpiece'?
I
believe that they tend to look for something that technically or conceptually
unique for the era- a piece of work that challenges the norm. However, a
masterpiece may not be considered a masterpiece at the time it is made but in
later years. An example of this is Duchamp’s scandalous work which was a
porcelain urinal on the wall, signed "R.Mutt" and titled ‘ Fountain’.
It was a piece of art that at the time caused massive controversy, but it was
an idea that changed art history forever. It is now seen as the 20th
century’s most influential modern art work of all time. Moving art history to the conceptual nature is
more in tune with why he is known to be the father of conceptualism.
Do you believe
that there are any specific qualities/styles that are exhibited in all famous
pieces of art?
Sometimes
what makes a piece of art famous is the story behind the artwork, or even the
artist themselves. For example, Da Vinci – is a symbol of the Renaissance for
his many talents in Art and Science, but due to his mysterious character at
that time many people did not understand him or his works, so they were not
interesting. His paintings are technically exceptional and exhibit complex symbolism
i.e. Madonna on the rocks. This over the eras, always caused controversy and
there was a lot of speculation of what they meant. Another example is the
Mona Lisa. Not only did it revolutionize painting, the sitter pose broke
tradition as the portrait was painted from the waist up with extraordinary vividness and the lady in the
painting was an unknown sitter. The Mystique of Leonardo, the early mystery, publicity
and artistic revolution all contribute to the Mona Lisa’s fame.
Is there ever
disagreement in the art community about what makes a Masterpiece?
Of
course- all the time and like the Louvre director Henri Loyrette says ‘It is
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to articulate a definition of
masterpiece that could be accepted universally’. Art Historians, critics,
scholars, curators and collectors don’t always agree.
What makes some
artists like Picasso stand out when there are many similar styled artists?
Picasso,
like all master’s, was the first to do something great in art history. He was a
genius at using mass media to further his name making him very famous during
his lifetime. He had exceptional business skills, like the Damien Hirst of our
time, but most importantly, as an artist, he was responsible for influencing
and inventing some of the greatest art movements of the 20th
century; namely fragmenting the Renaissance painters space/perspective,
innovating and rendering of collage & assemblage, found-object art, had a
constructionist approach to sculpture and his impact upon the developments of
modernism and eventually abstraction are of major importance. Most expert’s
opinion of Picasso's work is highly regarded and many agree that after Picasso through
the 1950s, many artists were aware of Picasso's work and a good many were
challenged by it in one way or another. Some were clearly inspired by it and
others rebelled against it... but in either way, he was not to be ignored.
What features
are present in a 'masterpiece'?
A masterpiece is highly subjective in art so
there really there isn’t one recipe. When I studied Art History, I remember the
finishing day of my classes after 4 years of studying art history which
included many topics- the canons, styles, movements, artists, controversies and
conceptual debates. My professor turned to our class and boldly said ‘Ok, so,
WHAT IS ART?’. It could literally be
anything to one person from the next and the more information you have the more
you can argue what makes Art, Art. The same goes for a Masterpiece I think
really. If I had to choose, I think some of the greatest masterpieces are
either from our ancient civilisations, such as ancient Roman sculpture of the
Hellenistic period where the bodies became almost life like. The artist’s
rendering veins and musculature of the human body to an extraordinary level
when they didn’t have the technology we do today. Or early medieval 13th
century paintings by Giott. This is when artists are just figuring out how to
render space and light for the first time. These fascinate me.
Is there a shift in what is considered
masterpiece art over time?
I
stick to what I said above… but I do think things have changed. I think
Renaissance masters would look at Damien Hirst’s formaldehyde animals and
certainly wouldn’t call them a master piece, but art is more conceptual and
about challenging an audience. Technical ability is still important of
course, but just in a different way, maybe not in paintings but how a large
scale installation is designed and project managed.
Any particular
artistic medium that is favoured? For example, why are there more world
renowned paintings than pencil sketches?
This
is not necessarily true, but painting is probably the most renowned because of
some of the famous artists the general public know about i.e. Da Vinci, Michelangelo,
Picasso, Pollock etc. Painting is the finished product for a lot of
exquisite sketches that aren’t necessarily known about. The National Gallery
exhibited many of Da Vinci’s unfinished sketches for studies he did on the
human form and these are considered great works because of the artist and the
extraordinary technique and understanding of not only the human form but pen to
paper.
What do we think at Lolo and Galago?
We
would agree that producing a truly beautiful and great piece of art is as much
about the concept, meaning and design behind it as the technical achievement of
the piece.
As Jess mentions, there are many talented artists that are able to reproduce
techniques, styles and forms, but a piece really stands out when it is at the
forefront of design and challenges traditional norms. It takes true vision to
be able to step outside the design box and consider every element of the work,
from its structure, composition, meaning and then create this flawlessly. At Lolo and Galago, we consider this approach
crucial to the design process of all our luxury jewellery and it is for this
reason we remain constantly inspired by every aspect of art, fashion, nature
and architecture around us. It results in every piece we produce having a
meaning behind it, so that you know your jewellery is not just a beautifully
crafted piece, but also a work of art.
Written by Rosie May Reddington